Met Commissioner Calls for Children's Rights to Outweigh Paedophiles in Justice System
Sir Mark Rowley has publicly criticised the justice system after a convicted paedophile who used AI to create sexualised images of children was granted bail to a flat overlooking a playground, sparking a debate over how courts balance the rights of victims and offenders.
Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, has taken the unusual step of publicly criticising the justice system, arguing that the rights of children must take precedence over those of paedophiles. His intervention follows the case of Zafer Dogan, who was convicted of taking thousands of photographs of women and girls and then using artificial intelligence to transform them into nude images.
Dogan was jailed for two years and four months. However, before sentencing, he was granted bail to a flat that overlooks a playground, a decision Sir Mark described as «unfathomable». The Commissioner said the case illustrated a broader problem in which the justice system is letting down victims, particularly children.
The case has drawn attention to the growing use of AI to create sexualised images without consent, a practice that can cause severe psychological harm to those depicted. Sir Mark argued that the justice system must adapt to such technological developments and ensure that the protection of children is not compromised by procedural decisions that appear to prioritise the rights of offenders.
His comments have prompted a response from the Government, which said that bail should be granted «where proportionate». The statement suggests that ministers believe the judiciary must weigh individual circumstances carefully, but it stops short of endorsing the specific decision in Dogan's case.
The Metropolitan Police Commissioner's decision to speak out is significant because senior police officers rarely comment directly on court rulings. His remarks reflect mounting frustration within law enforcement about cases involving online sexual abuse and the capacity of the courts to handle them appropriately.
Dogan's conviction involved the non-consensual creation of intimate images, a crime that has become easier to commit with the spread of accessible AI tools. The images he produced were derived from photographs taken without the knowledge or consent of the women and girls involved.
The case has also raised questions about how the justice system assesses risk when granting bail. Placing an offender near a playground, even temporarily, has been criticised as a failure to consider the safety of children in the local community.
Sir Mark's intervention is likely to intensify the debate over sentencing, bail decisions, and the use of technology in crime. It also highlights the tension between the rights of defendants and the need to protect vulnerable people, a balance that courts must strike in every case.
The Government's response indicates that it is aware of the sensitivity of the issue but has not committed to any immediate changes. The case may nevertheless add momentum to calls for reform, particularly regarding how the justice system handles AI-generated sexual abuse material and the conditions under which bail is granted.
For now, the Commissioner's public criticism stands as a rare direct challenge to the courts from the top of Britain's largest police force. It underscores the wider argument that the protection of children should be the paramount consideration in cases involving sexual offences, and that the justice system must be seen to reflect that priority.
2
